ArticleScientific reports2026
Estimation of liquefaction-induced settlement of shallow foundation by machine learning with imbalanced data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Estimating the level of earthquake-induced liquefaction settlements in shallow foundations is essential for assessing seismic risk and designing effective soil improvement strategies. Reliable predicting methods of vertical deformations and tilting in buildings founded on shallow liquefiable soils enable the development of seismic-resilient and cost-effective foundation solutions while supporting informed decision-making in earthquake insurance and mitigation planning. This study presents a comparative analysis of machine learning and deep learning models for classifying liquefaction-induced building settlements using a systematically compiled database of documented case studies. The dataset integrates building characteristics, geotechnical parameters, and seismic intensity indicators. Different kinds of resampling methods working at data level, cost-sensitive learning strategies, and algorithm-level advancements were studied in detail to treat extremely skewed class distribution. A SHAP-based feature selection method was applied as an extension to identify the most influential predictors, optimizing model efficiency without sacrificing predictive performance. Moreover, to improve classification reliability, dynamic threshold tuning and ensemble learning with weighted voting was employed. The result points out that data-driven feature selection and threshold optimization can better classify seismic damage, thus offering geotechnical earthquake engineering applications a methodology that is both interpretable and computationally efficient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.