ArticleScientific reports2026
A pilot study of a mobile application for postural analysis and training support in Shotokan Karate.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bio-Inspired Enhanced Adaptive Centered Collision Optimizer for Hyperparameter Optimization of Multi-Scale Spatio-Temporal ConvNeXt in Boxing Action Recognition.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a smartphone application that supports Shotokan Karate training by analysing posture and providing real-time feedback. The app evaluates three fundamental stances (Zenkutsu Dachi, Kokutsu Dachi, and Kiba Dachi) using Google ML Kit Pose Detection to extract body landmarks and compute joint-angle and alignment features, including proxy indicators of weight shift. The app also includes conditioning exercises (squats and push-ups) and a reflex-oriented interaction task. Results from a single-participant pilot are reported as feasibility evidence only and should not be generalised. A larger validation study with at least 30 practitioners across three skill levels (beginner, intermediate, advanced) is required, together with power analysis and reliability assessment, before broader conclusions can be drawn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.