ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi criteria optimization of FDM process parameters for NylonAF80 filaments using CRITIC CoCoSo and machine learning approaches.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to optimize the fused deposition modeling (FDM) process parameters for an 8% aramid fiber-reinforced polyamide filament (NylonAF80) to enhance the quality of printed parts. Six parameters were varied: the slice height, nozzle temperature, bed temperature, deposition speed, raster orientation, and build orientation. Cuboid samples with a central circular hole were printed using Taguchi's L18 orthogonal array, and evaluated for volumetric error, average roughness, and Shore D hardness. The CRITIC-CoCoSo technique identified optimal settings of 0.1 mm slice height, 255 °C nozzle temperature, 100 °C bed temperature, 40 mm/s deposition speed, 90° raster orientation, and on-edge build orientation to maximize the multi-response performance index. Sensitivity analysis using different weighting schemes and MCDM methods showed strong correlations (> 0.93) between rankings. The decision tree algorithm exhibited superior performance to k-nearest neighbor, stochastic gradient descent, and logistic regression in classifying output responses, achieving 88.9%, 94.4%, and 100% accuracies for hardness, volumetric error, and roughness, respectively, at an 80:20 split ratio. Slice height was the most influential factor for all responses. FESEM microstructural analysis revealed pores and voids in the samples printed under extreme conditions and at high slice heights. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing FDM parameters to improve the quality of NylonAF80 parts for industrial applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.