ArticleScientific reports2026
Predicting concrete compressive strength using optimized deep learning and large language models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of siderite aggregate substitution on chloride resistance, durability, and gamma-ray shielding of heavy concrete.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Concrete compressive strength prediction presents a fundamental challenge in sustainable construction material design due to the intricate nonlinear interactions among mixture components, admixtures, and curing conditions. This study introduces a hybrid framework that integrates the cognitively inspired iHow Optimization Algorithm (iHowOA) with Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks (STGCN) to enhance predictive accuracy for concrete compressive strength estimation. A large language model (LLM)-driven preprocessing pipeline is employed to improve data quality through semantic validation, feature harmonization, and intelligent handling of inconsistencies, leading to robust input representations. The iHowOA optimizes the STGCN architecture by leveraging hierarchical knowledge acquisition, balanced exploration-exploitation, and adaptive decision-making mechanisms. The graph-based model captures spatial dependencies among compositional variables and temporal strength evolution during curing. Extensive benchmarking against ten established metaheuristic optimizers demonstrates that the proposed iHowOA-STGCN framework achieves superior predictive performance on the evaluated public dataset, yielding lower prediction errors and higher correlation coefficients compared to baseline models. Exploratory data analysis further highlights key cement-strength relationships, age-dependent strength gain patterns, and physicochemical interactions relevant to feature engineering. While the experimental results indicate that the proposed framework is a promising data-driven decision-support approach for concrete strength prediction, further validation on diverse datasets and real-world scenarios is required to assess its generalizability and practical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.