ArticleScientific reports2026
Plant spraying quality when used by drone-robots.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The effect of rotor airflow from plant protection UAV on pesticide application in rice.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study aimed to evaluate how airflow from a small drone’s rotor affects the accuracy and consistency of liquid coverage on individual plants or small plant groups during low-altitude spraying. The research focused on the future possibility of using drones - unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) as autonomous robots for plant protection. The effects of UAV propellers’ rotation on changes in droplet stream, produced from a single spray flat fan nozzle, as well as the influence of altitude, flight speed, and leaf area index (LAI), on the liquid coverage uniformity (CU) of application on plants were examined. The rotational speeds of the UAV propellers were set at 0.0, 5000, and 6400 rpm. Rapeseed and potato plants were selected for testing because they are common food crops and sources of raw materials for biofuel production. The UAV, on a laboratory test stand, was moved at two heights (H = 0.5 and 1.0 m) at two speeds (v = 0.54 and 1.0 m·s-1). The airflow from the UAV’s rotors narrowed the droplet stream produced by the nozzle by about 20% and increased the liquid volume in the center of the droplet stream, especially at a UAV height of H = 1.0 m. The leaf area index (LAI) for rapeseed was 0.877, and for potatoes it was 6.273. These LAI differences resulted in the liquid sprayed from the UAV settling more evenly on rapeseed plants than on potato plants. UAV flight altitude and leaf area index (LAI) appeared to be key factors affecting the amount of liquid applied to plants. Lower altitudes (H = 0.5 m) improved liquid application uniformity and enabled deeper penetration into dense foliage. High LAI values significantly hampered liquid penetration into lower plant levels and reduced the uniformity of liquid application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.