ArticleScientific reports2026
Sustainable soil stabilization with Nano-Silica and polypropylene fibers mechanical properties durability and microstructural analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Improving soil stability is essential for geotechnical applications, yet conventional stabilizers like cement and lime often pose serious environmental challenges. This study investigates the synergistic effects of polypropylene fibers and nano-silica on soil unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and durability against dry-wet and freeze-thaw cycles. Then, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to investigate microstructural behavior of treated soil. Results reveal that nano-silica and fibers exhibited synergistic effects, achieving peak UCS value of 923.1 kPa at 2% content nano-silica associated with 2% content polypropylene fibers treated soil. The fiber improvement ratio consistently outperforms the nano-silica improvement ratio, suggesting that polypropylene fibers provide a greater contribution to soil strength enhancement in the mixture. Furthermore, soil treated with 2% nano-silica and 2% polypropylene fiber exhibited significantly lower deterioration across all cycles, demonstrating enhanced resistance to both dry-wet and freeze-thaw processes. The reduction in T2 curve peaks of NMR revealed that the addition of both polypropylene fibers and nano-silica reduced soil porosity and refined the soil pore structure, with nano-silica demonstrating superior efficacy in these aspects relative to polypropylene fibers. SEM analysis revealed that nano-silica fills soil pores and binds to particle surfaces, while fibers form a three-dimensional network, collectively enhancing soil compaction and structural integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.