ArticleScientific reports2026
Predicting patient satisfaction in digital orthodontics using a KAC based model integrating AI support and risk stratification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding and predicting patient satisfaction in digital orthodontics is essential for ensuring treatment effectiveness and optimizing human–AI collaboration. However, structured behavioral models for satisfaction prediction remain limited. This study aimed to develop and validate a patient satisfaction prediction model based on the Knowledge–Attitude–Challenge (KAC) framework in digital orthodontics, and to evaluate its discriminative performance and clinical utility in risk stratification. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 500 orthodontic patients and 500 orthodontists across 31 provinces in China. Two KAC-based questionnaires were developed and validated to quantify the three dimensions. High satisfaction was defined as a score of ≥ 4 on item Q6. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed and evaluated using area under the ROC curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Patients were stratified into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups based on predicted probabilities. Higher Knowledge (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.09–1.21) and Attitude scores (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.06–1.15) were positively associated with high satisfaction, whereas Challenge scores were negatively associated (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90–0.98). The model demonstrated good discriminatory power (AUC = 0.79) and yielded notable clinical net benefit within the threshold range of 0.2–0.6. Satisfaction rates varied significantly across risk strata: 89.1% in the low-risk group versus 51.3% in the high-risk group (P for trend < 0.001). The KAC-based model effectively predicts patient satisfaction in digital orthodontics and offers strong interpretability and clinical relevance. It may assist clinicians in identifying patients at risk of low satisfaction and support the optimization of AI-assisted treatment pathways and patient-centered communication strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.