ArticleScientific reports2026
Modeling of wheat yield using plant structural biomarkers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research focused on enhancing wheat yield modeling by incorporating plant morphological parameters, specifically the Leaf Area Index (LAI) normalized by plant height (H) and its square (H²), alongside the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). The goal was to assess whether dimensional parameters such as LAI/H and LAI/H² improve yield prediction accuracy compared to using NDVI alone. Data analysis was performed at 60, 90, and 120 days after sowing (DAS). The LAI/Height² parameter demonstrated a stronger correlation with observed yields, with R² values ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 across all DAS stages. However, at DAS 60, the model’s performance was poor for certain plots (F3, N1-N3), indicating variability due to specific plot conditions. Combining NDVI with LAI/Height and LAI/Height² further enhanced predictive accuracy, with R² values consistently between 0.71 and 0.81 across DAS 60, 90, and 120. Despite these improvements, the INSEY model based solely on NDVI showed limited predictive capability. The study emphasizes that while NDVI captures vegetative vigor, integrating plant morphological traits better accounts for yield variability. Future research should investigate cumulative NDVI and direct measurements of LAI along with height, considering environmental and agronomic factors such as nutrient application, soil fertility, and weather conditions. These findings contribute to refining crop yield models, enabling more accurate forecasting and informed agronomic practices. Overall, the combination of NDVI, LAI, and plant height proves to be a robust method for predicting wheat yield, especially when monitored at critical growth stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.