ArticleScientific reports2026
CMAF-Net: cross-modal attention fusion with information-theoretic regularization for imbalanced breast cancer histopathology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer diagnosis from histopathology images remains challenging due to two intertwined factors: severe class imbalance, where malignant cases represent a small minority of samples, and the need to integrate discriminative features across multiple spatial scales. Existing methods typically address imbalance and multi-scale fusion separately, leading to biased or redundant representations. We propose CMAF-Net, a theoretically grounded architecture that unifies information bottleneck principles with margin-based learning to jointly tackle these challenges. CMAF-Net employs a dual-branch CNN-Transformer backbone fused through a Cross-Modal Attention Fusion block, which implements temperature-controlled attention and redundancy minimization to preserve complementary local and global features. At the classification level, we introduce an Adaptive Class-Balanced Focal Loss that operationalizes margin theory under imbalance, enforcing larger margins for minority classes while dynamically adapting to feature distributions. Extensive experiments on the IDC dataset show that CMAF-Net achieves 94.92% sensitivity and 95.52% balanced accuracy, outperforming state-of-the-art baselines by up to 8.6% on malignant detection. Under extreme 99:1 imbalance, CMAF-Net maintains 76.45% sensitivity, demonstrating graceful degradation where competing methods fail catastrophically. Cross-dataset evaluation on BreakHis confirms robust zero-shot transfer across four magnifications with average sensitivity of 95.61%. Ablation studies and information-theoretic analyses validate the contributions of each component, while computational profiling shows CMAF-Net achieves superior accuracy-efficiency trade-offs compared to prior fusion networks. Beyond breast cancer, our framework establishes a principled template for information-theoretic fusion under class imbalance, with implications for rare disease detection, clinical decision support, and broader multi-modal learning tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.