SynthesisJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2026
Placental Stiffness Measured by Sonoelastography in Fetal Growth Restriction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesFetal growth restriction (FGR), commonly caused by placental insufficiency, is a critical obstetric condition requiring accurate and timely detection to mitigate adverse outcomes. Placental sonoelastography, an advanced ultrasound technique that evaluates tissue stiffness, has emerged as a promising tool for assessing placental health.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the usefulness of placental elastography in FGR. We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science up to January 2025 for in-vivo studies comparing placental elastography in the FGR and healthy control groups. Data from the included studies were pooled using random-effects models to calculate standardized mean differences (SMD) and mean differences (MD) in placental stiffness. Additionally, correlation coefficients were pooled, and diagnostic accuracy metrics, including sensitivity and specificity, were synthesized using a bivariate random-effects model.
resultsA total of 14 studies were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis revealed significantly increased placental stiffness in FGR pregnancies. For Young's modulus, the pooled analysis of 9 studies yielded an SMD of 2.51 (95% CI: 0.72-4.30). For shear wave velocity, the pooled analysis of 6 studies revealed an SMD of 1.55 (95% CI: 0.83-2.28). Significant heterogeneity was noted in these analyses. Pooled data from 3 studies demonstrated a significant negative correlation between placental stiffness and birth weight (r = -0.453). The diagnostic accuracy, assessed from 4 studies, was high, with a pooled sensitivity of 92.0% and specificity of 98.9%. DISCUSSION: Placental sonoelastography stands out as a powerful, non-invasive technique that could significantly enhance the clinical assessment and surveillance of pregnancies at risk for FGR, potentially leading to more timely and effective interventions. This quantitative measure not only distinguishes FGR cases from healthy pregnancies with high accuracy but also correlates with meaningful neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.