ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2026
Preservation of cell-free RNA in percutaneous core-needle biopsy specimens' supernatants from non-small cell lung cancer improves genomic testing performance.
Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This prospective single-center study aimed to investigate whether preserving cell-free ribonucleic acid (cfRNA) in specimens' supernatants (SS) obtained from percutaneous core-needle biopsy (CNB) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can improve the performance of genomic testing. Forty-three NSCLC patients who underwent image-guided CNB were enrolled. The SS from each CNB specimen was divided into two parts: one was mixed 1:1 with a cfRNA-protective solution, and the other was left unhandled. For quantitative analysis, 30 patients (regardless of mutation status) were evaluated by comparing cfRNA yield between cfRNA-protected and -unprotected SS. For qualitative analysis, 15 patients with fusion gene alterations were assessed by comparing genotyping results from cfRNA-protected SS to those from paired CNB specimens. Pneumothorax was the most frequent adverse event in CNB procedures, occurring in 20.9% of cases (9/43). No one experienced severe adverse events. In the quantitative analysis, 90.0% (27/30) of cfRNA-protected SS yielded adequate cfRNA, significantly higher than 53.3% (16/30) in cfRNA-unprotected SS (p < 0.01). In the qualitative analysis, despite ineffective cfRNA preservation in three cases, DNA-level mutations were still detected in both the CNB specimens and cfRNA-protected SS. The overall concordance of genotyping results between cfRNA-protected SS and paired CNB specimens was 100%, correctly identifying all ALK fusions, ROS1 rearrangements, and MET-14 skipping alterations. These findings highlight that preserving cfRNA in CNB-SS from NSCLC can improve the performance of genomic testing, particularly for RNA-based assays, without compromising the accuracy of DNA-based assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.