ArticleThorax2026
Increase in second primary lung cancers in a nation-wide cohort study from Sweden.
Article in Thorax, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does lung adenocarcinoma subtyping offer clinical benefits?-a retrospective population-based cohort study from Sweden.Annals of translational medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe describe the occurrence of second primary lung cancers (SPLCs) and their determinant in Sweden.
methodsNation-wide cancer registry from years 1961 to 2021 identified a total of 853 SPLCs.
resultsThe incidence of SPLCs increased almost linearly from 1980 onwards, equally for women and men and approximately equally after the four main histological types. SPLC included adenocarcinoma 63.9%, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) 19.4%, small cell carcinoma 9.6% and large cell carcinoma 9.1%. The female cumulative probability (CumP) of SPLC after first adenocarcinoma in 10 years reached 0.019, after SCC 0.015 and after small and large cell carcinoma 0.008. The respective CumP for men was 0.013, 0.012, 0.002 and 0.005. While adenocarcinoma was often followed by second adenocarcinoma, after first non-adenocarcinoma SPLCs presented in diverse histologies. Relative risk of SPLC compared with first lung cancer was overall 3.59, higher for women (4.16) than for men (2.99) and approximately equally high after adenocarcinoma and SCC. In patients diagnosed before age 55 years, the relative risk was 6.68 for all, but after female adenocarcinoma it was 9.95 compared with 6.77 for males. The highest relative risks, up to 20-fold, were found after early onset female adenocarcinoma diagnosed after defined T stages.
conclusionsAlthough SPLCs are still rare, their number is increasing rapidly and the relative risks compared with first lung cancer are substantial, qualifying selected groups of high-risk patients, such as patients with early onset adenocarcinoma for early detection by CT screening when/if such tests become available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.