Observational studyBritish journal of anaesthesia2026
Postoperative outcomes in older patients with postoperative delirium in the UK: SNAP-3, a snapshot observational study.
Observational study in British journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelirium occurs in about 6% of older surgical patients and more frequently in those who are older or frail or undergo urgent surgery. It is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. However, it remains unclear to what extent delirium is the cause of worse outcomes and to what extent it is a marker of other pre-existing vulnerabilities.
methodsWe conducted a prospective observational cohort study of UK patients aged 60 yr and above undergoing surgery (excluding minor procedures) over 5 days in March 2022. Data were collected on patient characteristics and clinical variables, postoperative delirium, length of stay (LOS) in hospital, morbidity, and mortality. Delirium was assessed on postoperative days 3 and 7 using the four A's Test or Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit tools, supplemented by structured notes review. We analysed the impact of delirium on postoperative outcomes using quantile regression and mixed effects logistic regression, with adjustment for confounding informed by directed acyclic graphs and covariate missing data handled using multiple imputation.
resultsAnalysis included 7128 patients from 214 hospitals. The incidence of delirium was 6.7% (479/7128). Delirium was associated with longer LOS (increase in median LOS of 5.2 days, effect estimate 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-6.5), higher odds of postoperative morbidity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 10.2; 95% CI, 7.4-13.9), 120-day mortality (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.6), and 1-yr mortality (aOR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.5-2.7). Sensitivity analysis excluding lower-risk daycase patients found similar results to the main analysis.
conclusionsDelirium, which is common in older people having surgery, negatively impacts on postoperative outcomes and thus must be included in perioperative shared decision-making with patients considering surgical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.