ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2026
Adoption, barriers and opportunities of interoperability and eHealth standards in Africa: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesInteroperability, the seamless exchange and use of data across digital health systems, is essential for integrated, efficient healthcare delivery. However, evidence on its adoption in Africa remains limited and fragmented. This scoping review aimed to map existing evidence, identify key barriers and highlight emerging opportunities for strengthening interoperability across all levels on the continent.
methodsWe conducted the review in line with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) framework. Searches were carried out across PubMed/MEDLINE, IEEE Xplore, African Index Medicus and Google Scholar, focusing on English-language publications from January 2010 to March 2025. Eligible sources included peer-reviewed articles, conference papers and relevant policy documents.
resultsSixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings revealed wide disparities in the adoption of interoperability standards, with countries such as Uganda, South Africa and Kenya showing greater momentum due to national digital strategies and health information exchange initiatives. Common challenges included limited technical capacity, fragmented infrastructure and inadequate regulatory support. However, there were encouraging developments around the use of open-source platforms like OpenHIE, regional policy alignment through the African Union Digital Health Strategy and growing public-private partnerships. DISCUSSION: Progress remains uneven, shaped by each country's digital maturity, workforce capabilities and policy landscape. Capacity-building and better alignment with global standards could bridge current gaps.
conclusionTo build resilient digital health systems, African countries must strengthen governance, invest in infrastructure and develop technical expertise. Future work should assess how interoperability influences clinical care and explore regional readiness for cross-border data exchange.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.