Observational studyBMJ open2026
Bayesian spatiotemporal modelling of neonatal, infant and under-5 mortality (2000-2022) in 41 Asian countries: a population-level observational study.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChild mortality continues to pose a major public health challenge across Asia. This study examines trends in under-5, infant and neonatal mortality and identifies key determinants, spatial risk patterns and projections through 2030 using spatiotemporal modelling.
methodsWe used national-level data from 41 Asian countries, representing over 80% of Asia's population, between 2000 and 2022, incorporating 26 health, environmental and sociodemographic indicators. A hierarchical Bayesian model using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation, incorporating fixed effects, spatially structured and unstructured random effects, and temporal smoothing, was used. Model performance was assessed via the Deviance Information Criterion, Watanabe-Akaike Information Criterion, coefficient of determination (R²), root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean absolute error metrics.
resultsUnder-5 mortality decreased significantly (p<0.001) from 46.73 to 18.53 per 1000 live births. Strong negative associations were observed between child mortality and vaccination coverage-rubella (r=-0.79), Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Pertussis (DTP) (r=-0.74), hepatitis B (r=-0.58) and rotavirus (r=-0.20). Female literacy (r=-0.20) and life expectancy (r=-0.30) also contributed to improved outcomes. Spatial analyses identified Afghanistan (under-5: 77.12), Bangladesh (57.12) and Myanmar (63.16) as high-risk hotspots, while Japan, Sri Lanka and the UAE maintained low predicted rates (≈0). Neonatal mortality patterns were flatter across time and space, peaking in Bangladesh (6.30), Indonesia (5.08) and Azerbaijan (5.00). Predictive accuracy was highest for neonatal mortality (R²=0.99; RMSE=1.93). Some countries, such as Yemen and the UAE, displayed near-zero or negative forecasts, suggesting sensitivity to spatial priors in sparse-data contexts.
conclusionsThe study highlights the critical role of immunisation and maternal education in reducing mortality, and the need for more targeted neonatal interventions. The white-box modelling framework enables both interpretability and reliable forecasting, supporting data-driven policy planning toward achieving advanced, equitable child survival, as outlined in Sustainable Development Goal 3.2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.