Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41748169›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2026

Contribution of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of adnexal torsion (COVARIAN): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Anne-Laure Fijean, Dorine Manhertz, Laura Massicot, Lise Lecointre, Nicolas Mottet, Emilie Raimond, Emmanuel Simon, Victor Gabriele, Olivier Morel, Marine Beaumont and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06677554 (COVARIAN - Contribution of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Adnexal Torsion), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06677554 phase3recruitingnot on this map

COVARIAN - Contribution of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Adnexal Torsion: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentral Hospital, Nancy, FranceRan2025 to 2028Enrolled256ConditionsAdnexal TorsionArmsAddition of ultrasound with contrast injection (SonoVue®), Standard Care (in control arm)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anne-Laure FijeanObstetrics and Gynecology, Nancy Regional University Hospital Center, Nancy, France a.fijean@chru-nancy.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3547-9889
Dorine ManhertzINSERM U1254, IADI, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Laura MassicotObstetrics and Gynecology, Nancy Regional University Hospital Center, Nancy, France.
Lise LecointreObstetrics and Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospitals Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Nicolas MottetGynécologie-obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon, Besançon, France.
Emilie RaimondObstetrics and Gynecology, Maison Blanche Hospital, Reims, France.
Emmanuel SimonObstetrics and Fetal Medicine, CHU Dijon, Dijon, France.
Victor GabrieleObstetrics and Gynecology, Strasbourg University Hospitals Gynecology Obstetrics and Fertility Center, Strasbourg, France.
Olivier MorelObstetrics and Gynecology, Nancy Regional University Hospital Center, Nancy, France.
Marine BeaumontINSERM U1254, IADI, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Gabriela HossuINSERM U1254, IADI, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Charline BertholdtObstetrics and Gynecology, Nancy Regional University Hospital Center, Nancy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdnexal torsion is a gynaecological emergency in which prompt diagnosis and management are critical to preserving ovarian function. However, the clinical presentation is often non-specific, and diagnosis primarily relies on pelvic ultrasound, a modality with limited sensitivity that can lead to misdiagnosis and unnecessary surgery. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has emerged as a promising imaging technique that may enhance diagnostic accuracy by better characterising adnexal vascularisation.The aim of this study is to assess whether the addition of CEUS to standard diagnostic procedures can reduce the rate of unnecessary emergency surgeries. Specifically, we compare two diagnostic strategies in cases of high clinical suspicion of adnexal torsion: the current standard approach versus an experimental strategy incorporating CEUS. The primary outcome is the rate of inappropriate surgical interventions, defined as emergency surgery performed within 6 hours without intraoperative confirmation of torsion. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, open-label, multicentre, randomised (1:1), controlled, superiority trial. A total of 256 women presenting with a high clinical suspicion of adnexal torsion will be enrolled over a period of 36 months. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the standard diagnostic strategy or an experimental strategy that includes CEUS. The primary endpoint is the proportion of emergency surgical procedures (performed within 6 hours of hospital admission) in which adnexal torsion is not confirmed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the French Ethics Committee, the CPP (Comité de Protection des Personnes) on 28 October 2024. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant national and international conferences. The ethical approval number from the CPP is 6115. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06677554; 2024-511720-13-00.

Indexed as

Adnexal DiseasesContrast MediaOvarian TorsionTorsion AbnormalityAdultFemaleHumansProspective StudiesUltrasonographyContrast Mediacontrast-enhanced ultrasoundovarian torsionsurgeryultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID41748169
PMCPMC12959076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.