ReviewVox sanguinis2026
Addressing racial disparities in representation across blood, stem cell and organ and tissue donor pools.
Review in Vox sanguinis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The INTEGRITY guidelines - ethical guidance for research involving deceased donation and transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesAdequate representation of donors from diverse ancestral populations in blood, stem cell and organ transplantation is critical to ensuring equitable access to these lifesaving therapies. Because of population-level differences in genetic markers, patients from racialized groups may have unique transfusion and transplantation needs. However, racialized populations remain underrepresented as donors, exacerbating existing health inequities. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis narrative review synthesizes the factors contributing to disparities in donor representation across donation products, identifying common barriers and proposing potential solutions.
resultsRacialized populations are significantly underrepresented in donor pools across all donation types, limiting access to optimal donation products and increasing the risk of adverse outcomes. Common barriers to donation for racialized peoples include healthcare mistrust, lack of knowledge and sociocultural factors such as religious beliefs and language barriers. Facilitators include culturally tailored education, community engagement and policy-driven initiatives.
conclusionAddressing disparities in donor representation requires a multifaceted approach integrating education, community trust-building and systemic policy changes. Cross-disciplinary efforts are essential to diversify donor bases and reduce inequities in access to optimal donation products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.