ReviewJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2026
Endoscopic Ultrasound for the Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future Perspectives.
Review in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are increasingly diagnosed, reflecting greater clinical awareness, improved imaging, and revised classification. This review summarizes evidence on epidemiology, diagnostic workup, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided management of PanNETs, encompassing diagnostic evaluation, tissue acquisition, and therapeutic interventions. EUS provides the highest diagnostic yield for lesions < 20 mm and enables detailed morphologic and vascular assessment through contrast-enhanced and harmonic EUS, quantitative elastography, and, in selected cases, needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Fine-needle biopsy is superior to fine-needle aspiration for specimen adequacy, immunohistochemistry, and Ki-67 assessment, but preoperative grading may still be underestimated, with direct impact on decisions between surveillance, surgery, and systemic therapy. Therapeutically, EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation achieves high short-term to midterm clinical and radiologic control in insulinomas ≤ 2 cm and in selected small nonfunctioning PanNETs, at the cost of adverse event rates around 15%-20%. Ethanol and microwave ablation are feasible but supported by less mature data, and all EUS-guided ablation strategies should currently be regarded as investigational, pending long-term comparative studies versus surgery and active surveillance. In borderline or locally advanced disease, neoadjuvant [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.