Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41748128›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of school health2026

Can Peer Victimization Invalidate the Positive Effect of Emotional Intelligence on Adolescents' Health-Related Quality of Life?

Ángela de Lourdes Martín-Pérez, Juan José Gascón-Cánovas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of school health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ángela de Lourdes Martín-PérezDepartment of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario General de Santa Lucía, Cartagena, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1591-3657
Juan José Gascón-CánovasInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2128-225X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmotional intelligence (EI) is a key factor in adolescents' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Previous research has shown that higher EI is associated with better HRQoL outcomes. However, its protective role may be weakened by adverse experiences such as peer victimization. This study examined whether forms of peer victimization moderate the relationship between EI and specific HRQoL dimensions.

methodsA total of 1427 Spanish adolescents completed a survey-based assessment, including validated measures of victimization (APRI-Bullying), HRQoL (KIDSCREEN-52), and EI (TMMS-24). Moderation effects were tested using multivariate linear regression and the PROCESS macro in SPSS.

resultsVerbal victimization moderated the associations between all EI dimensions and the "Social Support and Peers" HRQoL dimension. Social victimization moderated the relationships of "Attention" and "Clarity" with this dimension, whereas physical violence moderated the association between "Repair" and this dimension. No moderating effects were found for Psychological Well-being. IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL HEALTH POLICY, PRACTICE, AND EQUITY: School-based EI programs may enhance adolescents' coping with peer victimization and help protect HRQoL in victimized adolescents.

conclusionsThe positive association between EI and the HRQoL dimension related to perceived social support could disappear in adolescents exposed to moderate or high levels of peer victimization.

Indexed as

BullyingCrime VictimsEmotional IntelligencePeer GroupQuality of LifeAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleSocial SupportSpainSurveys and Questionnairesadolescentbullyingemotional intelligencehealth‐related quality of lifevictimization

Identifiers

PMID41748128
PMCPMC12945477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.