ArticleThe lancet. HIV2026
Recommendations from the 2nd Consensus Workshop on Analytical Treatment Interruption in HIV Research Trials.
Article in The lancet. HIV, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scientific synergy between prophylactic and therapeutic HIV vaccines-prevention and cure.NPJ vaccines · 2026Article
- Review
- How Vaccinating People Living With HIV May Guide bNAb‑Based Vaccines.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026Article
- Early immune responses anticipate HIV rebound and precede viral control.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors in HIV infection: current evidence on viral reservoir regulation and immune restoration.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The role of analytical treatment interruptions in shaping HIV-specific immunity and HIV cure.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Analytical treatment interruption (ATI) is an important tool to evaluate interventions designed to achieve HIV eradication or long-term control without antiretroviral therapy. We convened a stakeholder workshop to update the published recommendations for the conduct of ATI studies. Important changes to the recommendations include more lenient entry criteria on CD4 count, CD4 nadir, and past medical history, and allowance for greater variation based on regional standards. As the mechanism of potential HIV remission might rely on immune control, the criteria for antiretroviral therapy resumption now allow for longer periods of viraemia at higher levels to stimulate a more robust immune response. Greater emphasis is placed on the importance of psychosocial monitoring and support, the prevention of HIV transmission to partners during ATI, and the integration of sociobehavioural research into ATI studies. Recommendations for the conduct of paediatric and adolescent ATI trials, absent from previous guidelines, are now included. These recommendations, based on current available data, expert opinion, and community consultation, aim to help steer the safe and ethical implementation of the next generation of ATI trials as we continue the search for an HIV cure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.