ArticleJMIR human factors2026
Co-Created Digital Pretherapy Psychoeducation for Outpatients in Specialized Mental Health Care: Usability Evaluation and Patient Satisfaction Study.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpecialized mental health services are facing high demand, potentially leading to lower-quality care. One solution may be to prepare patients for attending treatment. Digital pretherapy psychoeducation may be particularly relevant. However, the effectiveness of such an intervention depends on user engagement and satisfaction, and usability is therefore one of the most important factors.
objectiveThis article has 2 objectives. Study 1 describes the development of StartHelp, a co-created digital pretherapy psychoeducation program for patients on waiting lists before their first consultation in outpatient specialized mental health services. Study 2 explores the usability of StartHelp, aiming to identify potential issues and assess whether the intervention is suitable for further evaluation in a randomized controlled trial.
methodsGuided by co-creation principles, we developed StartHelp in accordance with the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP2) checklist. To assess the app's usability, we recruited 10 patients from specialized mental health care to complete tasks during individual think-aloud interviews. Afterward, they completed questionnaires, including open-ended questions, an item assessing perceived video quality, 2 versions of the System Usability Scale (SUS), the 4-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-4), and a modified version of the CSQ-4 (CSQ-Video). The StartHelp project group discussed the results, and solutions to the identified issues were proposed and implemented.
resultsStudy 1 involved the development of StartHelp over 24 months. The app comprises 27 tasks, including 24 videos and links to 14 websites containing in-depth information. Study 2 involved usability testing with 5 men and 5 women. SUS scores for StartHelp's videos indicated good usability, with a mean of 83.7. By contrast, SUS scores related to navigating StartHelp's overarching architecture were barely acceptable, with a mean of 63.6. For the CSQ-4, the sample mean was 12.3, indicating moderate satisfaction. Mean scores on the CSQ-Video (10.9) indicated satisfaction in the lower moderate range. However, patients perceived the videos as high quality and rated them as nonoffensive. The qualitative findings supported the quantitative results. The usability tests revealed 1 major issue and several minor issues. The primary issue concerned navigation of the overarching technological infrastructure on which StartHelp was developed, rather than StartHelp itself. To address these issues and impracticalities related to interacting with the overarching technological infrastructure, we made minor changes to the StartHelp app.
conclusionsThrough a collaborative co-creation process, we developed StartHelp, a digital pretherapy psychoeducation program. Usability testing indicated that the content itself was highly usable, with video-related SUS scores suggesting good usability, whereas navigation of the overarching technological infrastructure received lower scores. Although patients rated the clinical material as high quality and nonoffensive, satisfaction scores were lower than anticipated. Nevertheless, StartHelp was deemed ready for further testing in a clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.