Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41747238›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2026

Using Wearable Video Cameras to Assess Screen Use Contexts in Preschool-Aged Children: Pilot Observational Study.

Amanda Machell, Katherine Downing, Simone J J M Verswijveren, Kylie D Hesketh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amanda MachellInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, 3220, Australia, 61 392446613.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9058-3435
Katherine DowningInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, 3220, Australia, 61 392446613.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6552-8506
Simone J J M VerswijverenInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, 3220, Australia, 61 392446613.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7709-7416
Kylie D HeskethInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, 3220, Australia, 61 392446613.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2702-7110

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Wearable video cameras may offer a feasible approach to assess the contexts of screen use (eg, screen content and co-use) among preschool-aged children. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the contexts of screen use among preschool-aged children using wearable video cameras. Methods: Children aged 2 to 5 years from Melbourne, Australia, wore a video camera for 1 day in the home environment during May 2023. One researcher manually coded video footage second by second; 15% was double coded for reliability. Coding included device type, screen activity, screen content classified using Common Sense Media ratings, streaming service, setting, social interaction, screen multitasking, and concurrent behaviors. Results: A total of 37,944 seconds (10.5 hours) of video camera footage from 8 children were identified and coded as screen use, equating to 21.8% (37,944/174,290) of total camera wear time (range 0.3%-74.0%). Screen use was predominately characterized by program viewing (n=37,461, 98.7% seconds) on televisions (n=34,192, 90.1% seconds) in the lounge room (n=33,710, 88.8% seconds). Programs scored low for educational value (mean 1.7, SD 1.4 of 5 stars), and approximately one-third (3/9, 33.3%) of programs were classified as appropriate for an age older than that of the children in this sample. Screen multitasking was rare (n=46, 0.1% of seconds), and coviewing occurred in approximately one-third of all screen use (n=11,010, 29%). Conclusions: Contexts considered beneficial for development (eg, educational and age-appropriate content) were infrequently observed. This suggests that interventions to equip parents with practical strategies to identify genuine educational content and recognize and avoid age-inappropriate content are warranted. However, our small sample size limits generalizability.

Indexed as

early childhoodscreen timesmartphonetablettelevision

Identifiers

PMID41747238
PMCPMC12945350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.