ArticleScience progress
High-temperature performance of mortar reinforced with graphene-carbon nanotube hybrids.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, a hybrid mixture of graphene nanosheets and carbon nanotubes was incorporated into cement-based mortar at a mass fraction not exceeding 0.15% of the cement content. The objective was to verify that the hybridization of multi-dimensional nanomaterials is a feasible approach for improving dispersion. The prepared mortar specimens were subjected to sustained elevated temperatures up to 600 °C. After cooling to room temperature, residual mechanical properties were tested with three replicates per group. The air-void network, microstructure, and morphology were characterized using X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and mercury intrusion porosimetry. The results indicate that incorporating this hybrid carbon nano material enhances residual strength and retards strength loss caused by elevated temperatures. After 28 days of standard curing, the G5C10 group (containing 0.05 kg/m3 graphene nanosheets and 0.10 kg/m³ carbon nanotubes) exhibited compressive and flexural strengths 37% and 28% higher, respectively, than the reference group without nanomaterials. Following exposure to elevated temperatures up to 400 °C, the hybrid mixture demonstrated superior performance. Specifically, the G5C10 group achieved a compressive strength of 38.09 MPa, which was 33% higher than that of the reference group. Microscopic characterization revealed that the hybrid structure in the G5C10 group helped suppress the agglomeration of individual nanomaterials, thereby achieving better dispersion within the cement matrix. This enabled effective filling and bridging effects, resulting in a denser microstructure. The pore structure was refined, which played a key role in preventing residual strength loss after high-temperature exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.