ArticleJournal of global health2026
Clinical safety trial of a thermal jacket among preterm or low birthweight neonates for hypothermia management at a tertiary-level health facility in Bangladesh.
Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06277843 (Development and Testing of a Low-cost and Reusable Thermal Jacket for Managing Preterm or Low-birth-weight Neonates in Bangladesh.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Development and Testing of a Low-cost and Reusable Thermal Jacket for Managing Preterm or Low-birth-weight Neonates in Bangladesh.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypothermia is a common and critical issue for preterm and low birthweight (LBW) neonates, who require effective thermal care management to survive. In a safety trial, we tested a thermal jacket comprising a reusable chemical warming pad and an insulating jacket designed for hypothermia management when skin-to-skin contact is not possible. We assessed its performance in maintaining neonates' body temperature within the euthermic range (36.5°C to 37.5°C) and evaluated whether it caused any adverse effects. Methods: We conducted a single-arm, open-label safety trial at a tertiary-level hospital in Bangladesh. We analysed a total of 68 two-hour thermal jacket events involving nine preterm or LBW neonates. The primary outcome was the percentage of events in which the neonate's body temperature was maintained within the euthermic range for two hours. The secondary outcome was any incidence of adverse clinical signs, including burn, rash, or skin irritation, that we observed during the event. We monitored axillary temperature and other vital signs at the beginning and every 30 minutes throughout each event period. We used a generalised estimating equations-Firth model to assess the effects of study factors on trial outcomes and success status. Results: The thermal jacket successfully maintained the euthermic temperature range in 96% of events. Its performance remained consistent across varying ambient temperature and humidity conditions, with no significant influence from environmental factors. The three unsuccessful events recorded temperatures outside the euthermic range, with a minimum temperature of 36.3°C and a maximum of 37.8°C. Neonates with initial hypothermia reached euthermia faster and remained euthermic with the support of the thermal jacket. We observed no instances of the above clinical signs. Conclusions: The thermal jacket safely maintained the preterm or LBW neonate's body temperature within the euthermic range. Further research is needed to assess the efficacy and effectiveness of this approach in larger clinical settings. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06277843.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.