Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41746991›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

An improved crayfish optimization algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems.

Shuai Zhang, Shuai Zhang, Jinhuang You, Heming Jia, Chuanmin Wu, Chibiao Liu, Laith Abualigah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shuai ZhangSchool of Information Engineering, Fujian Key Lab of Agriculture IOT Application, Sanming University, Sanming, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6071-6390
Shuai ZhangSchool of Information Engineering, Fujian Key Lab of Agriculture IOT Application, Sanming University, Sanming, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9746-7633
Jinhuang YouSchool of Information Engineering, Fujian Key Lab of Agriculture IOT Application, Sanming University, Sanming, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6563-5000
Heming JiaSchool of Information Engineering, Fujian Key Lab of Agriculture IOT Application, Sanming University, Sanming, China.
Chuanmin WuSchool of Information Engineering, Fujian Key Lab of Agriculture IOT Application, Sanming University, Sanming, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8395-2127
Chibiao LiuSchool of Information Engineering, Fujian Key Lab of Agriculture IOT Application, Sanming University, Sanming, China.
Laith AbualigahHourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By emulating crayfish behaviors such as social foraging, rapid retreat from threats, and adaptive sensing, the Crayfish Optimization Algorithm (COA) achieves a dynamic balance between global search and local exploration, improving optimization efficiency. However, COA suffers from diversity degradation, insufficient exploration capability, low optimization finding accuracy, and easy fall to a local minimum. To solve these problems, an improved crayfish optimization algorithm (ICOA) is proposed. Firstly, the position of the population is achieved through the application of the Sobol sequence mapping in the initialization phrase, which enhances the diversity within the population. Secondly, a Lévy flight strategy is proposed in the foraging phase, which avoids algorithms fall into local optimization and enhances the individuals' capacity for extensive exploration within the solution space. Subsequently, during the competition phase, using the Euclidean distance-fitness balanced competition strategy improves simultaneous development and exploration performance. To evaluate ICOA performance, the IEEE CEC2019 and CEC2020 benchmark functions and experiments were used in different dimensions for verification, followed by sensitivity analysis, quantitative analysis, and nonparametric statistical analysis. Furthermore, the effectiveness is validated in five engineering optimization problems, in which ICOA improved by 0.28%, 17.86%, 0.01%, 88.8% and 0.1%, respectively, compared to COA. ICOA exhibits enhanced optimization capabilities to tackle complex spatial and practical challenges. Incorporating multiple strategies markedly improve the efficacy of ICOA. This finding has significant implications in the field of engineering optimizations.

Identifiers

PMID41746991
PMCPMC12945318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.