Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41746970›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

Development and validation of interpretable multimodal clinical-radiomics models for predicting epileptogenic foci and surgical outcomes in tuberous sclerosis complex: A multicenter study.

Yang Li, Xingye Liu, Jie Li, Mingxun Xie, Shujing Li, Kaixuan Huang, Jiaxi Zhao, Xin Chen, Zeng He, Jing He and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Yang LiComprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xingye LiuComprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jie LiComprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Mingxun XieDepartment of Radiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shujing LiComprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Kaixuan HuangComprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jiaxi ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Sichuan, China.
Xin ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Sichuan, China.
Zeng HeComprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jing HeChongqing Institute for Brain and Intelligence, Guangyang Bay Laboratory, Chongqing, China.
Limeng SunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Armed Police Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, China.
Renrong JiangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Chun CuiDepartment of Radiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Li WangDepartment of Neurology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhonghong LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Armed Police Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, China.
Song ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Haifeng ShuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Sichuan, China.
Shengqing LvComprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Chunqing ZhangComprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Dong ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Di WangSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing, China.
Hui YangComprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Qiang GuoEpilepsy Center, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Jinan University, Guangdong, China.
Hongping TanEpilepsy Center, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Jinan University, Guangdong, China.
Xiaolin YangComprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shiyong LiuComprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhongke WangComprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2024-5841

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise localization and resection of epileptogenic (epi) foci from multiple cortical foci determine surgical outcomes in the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Although the use of intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) for detecting epileptic discharges remains the gold standard for identifying epi foci, its invasiveness and cost limit clinical application. We aimed to develop and validate a noninvasive, clinically applicable predictive model for epi foci identification and surgical outcome assessment in patients with TSC. This multicenter study focused on three retrospective cohorts and one prospective cohort from three comprehensive epilepsy centers from June 2013 to October 2024. Comprehensive clinical and imaging data (CT, MRI, and 18F-FDG PET) of cortical foci were collected. Nineteen individual machine learning (ML) models and three ensemble ML models (voting, averaging and super-learner [SL]) were developed on the basis of the clinical and radiomics features of cortical foci. Model performance was evaluated by using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, specificity, and sensitivity values, along with the F1 score, with additional validation being conducted via decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration curves. Follow-up data were collected at 1, 3, and >5 years to validate the ability of the ML models to predict long-term postoperative outcomes. Non-epi foci were clustered by using the k-means algorithm to investigate the mechanisms underlying postoperative epileptogenic transformation. A web-based tool was developed to provide a user-friendly interface for clinical application. A total of 665 cortical foci (epi foci, n = 161; non-epi foci, n = 504) were included in this study. The model integrating multimodal clinical-radiomics features performed better than the individual models based only on single-modal clinical or radiomics features did. The ensemble SL model using clinical-radiomics features demonstrated the best stability and superior predictive performance compared to those of individual models and an additional two ensemble models in prospective (AUC: 0.92) and two retrospective cohorts (AUCs: 0.91 and 0.87); moreover, it outperformed previously reported prediction models. In addition, the SL model effectively predicted 1-, 3- and >5-year surgical outcomes (AUCs: 0.93, 0.91, and 0.92, respectively). K-means revealed two clusters of non-epi foci, including those foci with epileptogenic potential and those without, which were potentially confirmed by the follow-up data. The web-based tool significantly increased the accuracy of junior clinicians (from 0.61 to 0.78), which matched the accuracy of senior clinicians (0.80). The multimodal clinical-radiomics model represents a noninvasive tool for predicting epi foci, guiding preoperative evaluation, addressing diagnostic discrepancies and enabling personalized treatment strategies in patients with TSC. The clinical application of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven clinical-radiomics models provides a useful tool and auxiliary reference for clinicians in preoperative epileptogenic foci prediction.

Identifiers

PMID41746970
PMCPMC12944716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.