ArticlePloS one2026
A pilot study on the acoustic effects of a pseudo-palatal plate on speech: Implications for articulatory rehabilitation devices.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraoral palatal plates used in electropalatography (EPG) and tongue-interface systems are designed to monitor articulatory movement with minimal disruption to speech. However, their presence may subtly influence acoustic characteristics by altering tongue mobility and intraoral airflow. This study examines the acoustic effects of a pseudo-palatal plate during the articulation of consonants and vowels. Speech samples from healthy adults were recorded with and without the plate and analyzed using spectral and phonatory measures, including Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs), second formant (F2) slope, jitter, shimmer, harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), and quadrilateral vowel space area (qVSA). MFCC-based correlation coefficients and F2 slopes remained highly consistent across conditions, indicating minimal impact on consonant articulation. Shimmer (-0.72%), HNR (+2.5 dB), and qVSA (-24.1%) exhibited directionally consistent changes, with qVSA trending toward reduction; however, overall variation was limited. Vowel formant structures and consonant production were preserved mainly, suggesting that the palatal plate did not significantly impair vocal function. These findings support the interpretation that observed acoustic shifts are more consistent with filter-level effects than with changes at the glottal source. Although palatal plates may introduce minor acoustic variations, their impact on speech production appears minimal, reinforcing their suitability for therapeutic and assistive use, provided that acoustic considerations are addressed during design and clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.