ArticlePloS one2026
Cultural and linguistic responsiveness in long-term care: A scoping review protocol on programs for residents and staff.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe demographic landscape of Western countries has shifted to a more diverse one. Along with the trend of an aging population, a new problem has emerged, which is the increased linguistic diversity in the aging population in these countries. As people age and their care needs increase, they may not receive optimal care if they don't speak the same language as their caregivers in long-term care facilities. Culturally and linguistically responsive long-term care services are important to ensure the best care for an aging population, but there is limited evidence in the literature on the scope and practice of these services. The objective of this scoping review is to map out the types of CLR programs in LTC settings and examine their core components and target populations.
methodsThe Arksey and O'Malley framework, further developed by Levac and colleagues, will be employed in this scoping review. The research question was framed using the PCC framework. A comprehensive systematic search was developed with an experienced librarian and will be conducted in Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, and Academic Search Complete. All primary study designs, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods, will be included. Studies must focus on culturally and linguistically responsive care programs used or implemented in long-term care services. There will be no date or language limitations. Findings will be thematically synthesized to answer the research question.
conclusionThis review protocol provides a transparent process for how it will be conducted. We aim to contribute to a better understanding of what culturally and linguistically responsive care programs exist, how cultural and linguistic responsiveness is currently addressed across diverse care environments, and what gaps remain in long-term care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.