ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Combining seasonal malaria chemoprevention with novel therapeutics for malaria prevention: a mathematical modelling study.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- New thinking for the next generation of antimalarials.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, and long-acting injectables are being developed to prevent Plasmodium falciparum malaria. These therapeutics may target multiple stages of the parasite life cycle; evidence is needed to articulate their benefits with chemoprevention and prioritise candidates for clinical development. We used an individual-based malaria transmission model to estimate the health impact of combining new therapeutics with seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC). Our modelling framework used emulator-based methods with models of pre-liver and blood stage therapeutic dynamics. We evaluated the benefit of combining therapeutics with SMC in children under five by estimating reductions in the cumulative incidence of uncomplicated and severe malaria, relative to SMC or the new therapeutic alone, during and five years after deployment. Results showed that new therapeutics may require extended pre-liver stage duration or multi-stage activity to combine with SMC. For three SMC cycles in a high transmission setting, a pre-liver stage therapeutic with partial initial efficacy (>50%) required a protection half-life >230 days to reduce cumulative severe cases by >23% during interventions, and >5% five years after deployment stopped. Longer protection was needed when combined with four or five SMC cycles. And, combining SMC with a multi-stage therapeutic increased public health impact both during and after deployment. These results indicate that combining SMC with malaria therapeutics active against multiple stages of the parasite life cycle can improve the effectiveness of SMC, and highlight the need for clinical development to prioritise multi-stage therapeutics for improved malaria prevention in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.