ArticlePLoS medicine2026
Effectiveness of a digital clinical decision support algorithm for guiding antibiotic prescribing in pediatric outpatient care in Rwanda: A pragmatic cluster non-randomized controlled trial.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05108831 (Dynamic Clinical Decision Support Algorithms to Manage Sick Children in Primary Health Care Settings in Rwanda), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Dynamic Clinical Decision Support Algorithms to Manage Sick Children in Primary Health Care Settings in Rwanda
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Better, not just fewer: Rethinking antibiotic prescribing.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoor adherence to clinical guidelines and diagnostic uncertainty are key contributors to antibiotic overprescription, accelerating antimicrobial resistance. We developed ePOCT+, a digital clinical decision support algorithm (previously published) that integrated oxygen saturation, hemoglobin measurements, and C-reactive protein testing to assist primary care clinicians in managing acutely ill children aged 14 years or below. The goal was to reduce antibiotic prescriptions without compromising clinical recovery. METHODS AND
findingsWe conducted a pragmatic, open-label cluster non-randomized controlled trial in 32 Rwandan health centers allocated to two groups by geography, balancing patient volume and infrastructure. Sixteen sites used ePOCT+ throughout; the other 16 provided standard care for five months before crossing over. This design supported three comparisons: intervention-control (months 1-5), before-after (control sites pre- versus post-crossover), and longitudinal assessment (intervention sites over 10 months). ePOCT+ was deployed in a digital application; the same application (without the algorithm) served as an electronic case report form in the control arm. Outcomes were analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, district, and presenting complaints. Superiority in antibiotic prescription (primary outcome) was defined as ≥25% reduction versus routine care. Non-inferiority for clinical failure (main secondary outcome) was defined as adjusted risk ratio upper 95% CI <1.3. Several other secondary outcomes were analyzed and reported. Between December 2021 and April 2023, 59,921 consultations were enrolled and 47,822 new consultations were analyzed. ePOCT+ uptake averaged 70% across all intervention periods. In the primary per-protocol analysis, antibiotic prescriptions declined from 70.5% to 24.5% in the intervention-control comparison (absolute difference -46.0, 95% CI [-52.5, -39.5]) and to 27.5% in the before-after comparison (absolute difference -43.0, 95% CI [-49.7, -36.4]). Reductions in the intention-to-treat sensitivity analysis were -36.7 (95% CI [-42.1, -31.3]) in the intervention-control comparison and -26.7 (95% CI [-32.2, -21.4]) in the before-after comparison, respectively. Prescription rates remained low (25%-40%) throughout the longitudinal assessment. Clinical failure rates were non-inferior (per-protocol aRR 1.07, 95% CI [0.97, 1.18] and 1.00, 95% CI [0.92, 1.10] in intervention-control and before-after analyses, respectively). In the intervention-control comparison, referral rates (aRR 2.11, 95% CI [1.20, 3.70]), primary hospitalizations (aRR 2.02, 95% CI [1.21, 3.38]), secondary hospitalizations (aRR 1.93, 95% CI [1.17, 3.16]), and severe outcomes (comprised primarily of non-referred secondary hospitalizations; aRR 1.88, 95% CI [1.11, 3.15]) were higher in the intervention arm; no differences were observed in the before-after comparison, suggesting possible baseline differences in patient severity rather than intervention effects. Re-attendance rates did not differ between arms. Malaria testing among febrile cases improved (aRR 1.27, 95% CI [1.08, 1.41]), while treatment adherence remained high. Study limitations included non-randomized design and self-reported outcomes.
conclusionsePOCT+ substantially reduced antibiotic prescribing in Rwandan pediatric primary care without compromising clinical recovery. Integration into Rwanda's national electronic medical record platform is critical to ensure unified clinical and reporting functions. This could streamline service delivery, improve data quality, and promote evidence-based care at scale.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT05108831.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.