Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41746836›Full record

ArticleEmerging topics in life sciences2025

Integrating Smart Worksheets into mandatory pre-laboratory exercises increased exercise completion rates and laboratory test grades.

Imaan Huseeb, Ines Ramos-Harrison, Andrew Kenny, Tanya Klymenko, Franziska Ludwig, Jef Clark, Emily Coyte, Leanne Williams, Rachel Schwartz-Narbonne, Clare Curtis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging topics in life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Examining Science Practices in an Introductory Biology Laboratory Curriculum.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Imaan HuseebSheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S1 1WB, U.K.
Ines Ramos-HarrisonSheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S1 1WB, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-0142-1224
Andrew KennySheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S1 1WB, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-6429-4736
Tanya KlymenkoSheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S1 1WB, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-8029-3082
Franziska LudwigSheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S1 1WB, U.K.ORCID 0009-0006-0356-0566
Jef ClarkSheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S1 1WB, U.K.ORCID 0009-0005-4796-942X
Emily CoyteLearnSci (Learning Science Ltd), Bristol, BS1 5DP, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-7557-0150
Leanne WilliamsLearnSci (Learning Science Ltd), Bristol, BS1 5DP, U.K.ORCID 0009-0006-5002-0749
Rachel Schwartz-NarbonneSheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S1 1WB, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-9639-9252
Clare Curtis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-laboratory exercises are assigned to promote student preparedness, but these provide no benefit if students do not engage. Students' perceived barriers to pre-laboratory-exercise engagement were identified via analysis of open and closed survey questions; key issues were time burden and perceived complexity. To facilitate future engagement, students suggested making pre-laboratory exercises clearer and easier to access with stylistic changes, as well as making them mandatory. Two interventions to first-year laboratories were implemented. First, LearnSci Smart Worksheets were deployed alongside traditional pre-laboratory exercises; these worksheets are interactive and scaffold learning. Second, the laboratory pass condition was changed from '70% physical attendance' to '80% engagement'. Engagement points were awarded for physically attending laboratory sessions (3 points) and for completing pre-laboratory exercises (0.5 points for traditional exercise, 0.5 points for Smart Worksheet exercise). Passing thus required a combination of physical attendance and completion of pre-laboratory exercises. Prior to the interventions, pre-laboratory exercises had low completion rates (16 ± 11% of students completed each monitored exercise). Post-interventions, 84 ± 3% of students completed each Smart Worksheet, and 79 ± 4% completed the traditional exercises. There was a statistically significant increase in mean laboratory test marks post-intervention (pre-intervention 65 ± 11%; post-intervention 72 ± 10%). Post-intervention, pre-laboratory exercise completion was significantly positively correlated with laboratory test marks. We hypothesise these two interventions increased incentives to engage with pre-laboratory exercises and so contributed to increasing student success.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementLaboratoriesHumansStudentsLearnScipedagogypre-laboratorypre-labsSmart Worksheets

Identifiers

PMID41746836
PMCPMC13043652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.