ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Mixed Methods Evaluation of "Cooking Monsters": An Empowerment-Focussed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Adolescent Nutrition Programme.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "It Is All About Education, Isn't It?": Community Priorities for an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Adolescent Nutrition Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Community Controlled Health Sector are well placed to address health equity concerns, including the disproportionate rates of obesity in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adolescents. Building on previous research, this study piloted a co-designed empowerment-focussed obesity prevention programme with rural Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adolescents.
methodsUsing mixed-methods, this research assessed nutrition and weight-related outcomes and explored programme acceptability and potential benefits through qualitative yarning. Seventeen adolescents participated.
resultsThere were no significant changes in quantitative weight-related and nutrition behaviour outcomes. However, qualitative insights suggest the programme was highly valued and viewed as a success. Community believed they could see observable changes in adolescent food literacy, empowerment and cooking confidence. Improvements for future delivery of the programme were identified by end-users. DISCUSSION: This study is strengthened by implementing critical success factors for obesity prevention programmes and demonstrating ethical research practice with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
conclusionFuture research opportunities continue to be actively explored by local community-controlled partners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.