Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41746758›Full record

ReviewReproduction & fertility2026

Reproductive science and wildlife conservation: the knowns and unknowns!

William V Holt, Pierre Comizzoli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproduction & fertility, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

William V HoltFaculty of Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Pierre ComizzoliSmithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Veterinary Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3079-9063

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract: Conservation biologists specializing in reproductive science for the support of threatened species are hampered by many knowledge gaps. One of the objectives of this review is to point out a few of those gaps. We discuss the surprising observation that modern genomic technologies are revealing inaccuracies in the identification of cryptic species, which is critically important for wildlife biobank management or where reproductive interventions are required. If confronted with a familiar species, but of unfamiliar origin, it would be unwise to assume that every aspect of their reproductive biology is exactly as expected. Serious gaps in detailed knowledge can mislead the biologist, and new projects and species are therefore usually hampered by unforeseen problems. Developmental plasticity is one of the key processes behind species diversity, whereby instead of embryos always developing along inflexible pathways, it is now clear that embryonic development can be modified by modulating gene expression through epigenetic mechanisms. In some cases, animals can improve their survival by migrating to optimal feeding or breeding grounds. Others can exploit reproductive delays that relax the synchrony that normally forces mating, or insemination, to occur at the same time as ovulation. While genetic properties such as inbreeding are known to modulate reproductive success, more recent research shows that even the microbiome can influence mammalian fertility. It is therefore becoming clearer that not only has evolution resulted in a bewildering diversity of reproductive adaptations, but attempts to support wildlife have to be backed up by a great deal of fundamental knowledge. Lay summary: All animal species, past and present alike, are the products of evolution, and although they have diversified in multiple directions, they currently occupy niches that optimize their future chances of survival. While animal evolution as an abstract concept usually brings to mind a series of changes taking place over long timescales, recent advances in developmental biology have shown that many animal species can also adapt surprisingly rapidly if their environment changes. For example, some tadpoles and fish embryos can sense that their watery habitat is drying out, whereupon they can either accelerate their development or bury themselves in mud until the waters return. How do they do it? While biologists are gradually discovering the mechanisms behind these, and other, unexpected responses confront biologists every day with knowledge gaps that have to be filled. Here, we explore some of these gaps and their influence on efforts to protect threatened species.

Indexed as

Animals, WildConservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesReproductionAnimalsadaptationbiodiversityreproductionthreatened specieswildlife

Identifiers

PMID41746758
PMCPMC13010306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.