ReviewReproduction & fertility2026
Reproductive science and wildlife conservation: the knowns and unknowns!
Review in Reproduction & fertility, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- One Embryology: impactful connections between human- and wildlife-assisted reproduction.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abstract: Conservation biologists specializing in reproductive science for the support of threatened species are hampered by many knowledge gaps. One of the objectives of this review is to point out a few of those gaps. We discuss the surprising observation that modern genomic technologies are revealing inaccuracies in the identification of cryptic species, which is critically important for wildlife biobank management or where reproductive interventions are required. If confronted with a familiar species, but of unfamiliar origin, it would be unwise to assume that every aspect of their reproductive biology is exactly as expected. Serious gaps in detailed knowledge can mislead the biologist, and new projects and species are therefore usually hampered by unforeseen problems. Developmental plasticity is one of the key processes behind species diversity, whereby instead of embryos always developing along inflexible pathways, it is now clear that embryonic development can be modified by modulating gene expression through epigenetic mechanisms. In some cases, animals can improve their survival by migrating to optimal feeding or breeding grounds. Others can exploit reproductive delays that relax the synchrony that normally forces mating, or insemination, to occur at the same time as ovulation. While genetic properties such as inbreeding are known to modulate reproductive success, more recent research shows that even the microbiome can influence mammalian fertility. It is therefore becoming clearer that not only has evolution resulted in a bewildering diversity of reproductive adaptations, but attempts to support wildlife have to be backed up by a great deal of fundamental knowledge. Lay summary: All animal species, past and present alike, are the products of evolution, and although they have diversified in multiple directions, they currently occupy niches that optimize their future chances of survival. While animal evolution as an abstract concept usually brings to mind a series of changes taking place over long timescales, recent advances in developmental biology have shown that many animal species can also adapt surprisingly rapidly if their environment changes. For example, some tadpoles and fish embryos can sense that their watery habitat is drying out, whereupon they can either accelerate their development or bury themselves in mud until the waters return. How do they do it? While biologists are gradually discovering the mechanisms behind these, and other, unexpected responses confront biologists every day with knowledge gaps that have to be filled. Here, we explore some of these gaps and their influence on efforts to protect threatened species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.