ReviewJournal of medical Internet research2026
AI-Enabled Wearables for Motor Function Assessment and Rehabilitation in Parkinson Disease: Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Technologies, Applicability, and Trade-Offs of AI in Palliative Care for Older Adults: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- What's in a name? reframing advanced Parkinson's disease as a multidimensional state.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Technology-enabled telerehabilitation for Parkinson's disease: a scoping review of digital rehabilitation systems, delivery architectures, and implementation challenges.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Conditional acceptance of emotion-recognition-enabled smart care devices for home-based rehabilitation and elderly care: a dual-perspective survey of prospective users and family caregivers.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI)-enabled wearable devices are rapidly emerging in rehabilitation and motor function assessment for patients with Parkinson disease (PD). However, evidence remains fragmented, integration into nursing practice is limited, and comprehensive synthesis is lacking.
objectiveThis study aimed to summarize studies on AI-enabled wearable devices for PD rehabilitation and motor function assessment, describing device types, monitored indicators, algorithms, and application characteristics, and identifying research gaps and barriers to clinical translation.
methodsGuided by the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) framework, 9 databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, SinoMed, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, and Embase) were searched from inception to December 2025. Eligible studies were published in English or Chinese from January 1, 2020, onward and enrolled people with PD using noninvasive, body-worn AI-enabled wearable devices for rehabilitation, assessment, or monitoring. Dissertations and full conference papers were included, whereas preprints and conference abstracts were excluded. Methodological quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, 2018 tool. Results were synthesized narratively and mapped to characterize devices, sensing modalities, algorithms, and evaluation methods.
resultsA total of 66 studies involving approximately 3579 participants were included. Wearable devices mainly comprised multisensor modules, smart insoles, and wrist-worn devices, with accelerometers being the most frequently used sensors. Data collection was predominantly passive, and most studies were conducted in laboratory or clinical settings using single- or short-term sessions. Internal validation approaches, particularly leave-one-out and k-fold cross-validation, were common, whereas external validation was rare, and reporting of calibration and clinical decision thresholds was limited. Sensitivity and accuracy were the most frequently reported performance metrics, highlighting substantial heterogeneity in analytical methods and outcome reporting.
conclusionsThis scoping review systematically synthesized evidence on AI-enabled wearable devices for motor function assessment and rehabilitation in PD, complemented by an evidence map and guided by a rehabilitation- and nursing-oriented perspective, and identified key translational gaps between proof-of-concept studies and real-world rehabilitation workflows. Compared with previous reviews that primarily focused on monitoring functions or device performance, this review places greater emphasis on rehabilitation applications and nurse-led translation into practice, and proposes a conceptual "challenges and opportunities" framework to inform the design, evaluation, and reporting of devices and algorithms, while further highlighting key considerations for workflow integration and the implementation of decision-support systems. These findings have practical relevance for advancing continuity of rehabilitation across clinical, home, and community settings, and may help guide nurses in delivering continuous monitoring, personalized follow-up, and timely intervention, thereby improving the efficiency and accessibility of rehabilitation management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.