ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2026
The 100-Miles for QVOICES (Queer Voices in Oncology Igniting Change Through Empowered Stories of Survivorship) Campaign: Overview of the Benefits and Costs of Crowdfunding as a Funding Mechanism for Research.
Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In today's unstable funding climate, alternative research funding mechanisms are essential. Investigators are facing novel barriers to acquiring funding for their research. Early-stage investigators, in particular those who are beginning their careers in research, are especially vulnerable to these funding disruptions. Currently, finding alternative funding is especially relevant for scientists studying historically and intentionally excluded communities, such as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or other sexual and/or gender expansive (LGBTQ+) populations, as many investigators have had their LGBTQ+ grants revoked by the Trump administration. Crowdfunding for research studies is a potential funding avenue that has grown in popularity, with more than US $12 million raised since 2012. This Viewpoint highlights crowdfunding as a potential funding model for LGBTQ+ cancer research, specifically to support the collection of preliminary data for predoctoral students and early-stage investigators. We describe the benefits and challenges of using crowdfunding as the sole funding mechanism for a mixed methods observational study among LGBTQ+ survivors of cancer. Despite challenges, crowdfunding can fund rigorous research on health disparities, notably in historically and intentionally excluded communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.