Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41746659›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2026

Effect of the Support, Educate, Empower Personalized Glaucoma Coaching Program on Medication Adherence: The SEE Program Randomized Clinical Trial.

Paula Anne Newman-Casey, Leslie M Niziol, Ming-Chen Lu, Deborah Darnley-Fisch, Nauman Imami, Jamie Mitchell, Chamisa MacKenzie, Michele Heisler

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04735653 (Support, Educate, Empower), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04735653 nacompletednot on this map

Support, Educate, Empower: The SEE Personalized Glaucoma Coaching Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MichiganRan2021 to 2024Enrolled236ConditionsGlaucomaArmsPersonalized Glaucoma Coaching, Enhanced Standard care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paula Anne Newman-CaseyDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Leslie M NiziolDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Ming-Chen LuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Deborah Darnley-FischDepartment of Ophthalmology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Nauman ImamiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Jamie MitchellSchool of Social Work, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Chamisa MacKenzieDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Michele HeislerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Medication nonadherence contributes to vision loss from glaucoma, a leading cause of irreversible blindness in the US. Intervention to improve adherence can benefit health outcomes and quality of life, while reducing health system and public health burden. Objective: To compare the Support, Educate, Empower (SEE) intervention with standard written education on glaucoma medication adherence. Design, Setting, and Participants: The SEE study was a parallel, nonmasked, 1:1 randomized clinical trial testing intervention superiority. Participants were recruited from the University of Michigan (UM) and Henry Ford Health System (HFHS) between April 27, 2021, and December 18, 2023. Adults with glaucoma taking 1 or more ocular hypotensive eye drop medications who self-reported adherence of 85% or lower were eligible. Intervention: The SEE intervention is a 6-month motivational interviewing-based glaucoma health coaching program administered by a nonphysician counselor, including 3 in-person sessions, 4 between-visit phone calls, personalized multimedia glaucoma education, and automated medication reminders. The control consisted of usual care and 3 mailings of standard written glaucoma education. Main Outcomes and Measures: Medication adherence (primary outcome) was electronically monitored (AdhereTech) and calculated as the percentage of doses taken on time divided by those prescribed over the 6-month study period. Change in glaucoma-related distress (secondary outcome) was also investigated. Results: Of 236 participants enrolled (108 in UM and 128 in HFHS), 235 (mean [SD] age, 67.3 [10.9] years; 124 [53%] female) were randomized to the SEE intervention (n = 117) or control (n = 118). Participant characteristics were balanced between groups. Mean (SD) self-reported adherence was 63.9% (17.9%). Medication adherence was significantly better in the SEE intervention group compared with that among control participants (mean [SD], 77.6% [19.7%]; n = 113 vs 58.0% [25.2%]; n = 114; difference, 19.7%; 95% CI, 13.7 to 25.6; P < .001), and more achieved 80% or greater adherence (62 of 113 [54.9%] vs 27 of 114 [23.7%]; P < .001). The difference in change in glaucoma-related distress between intervention and control was -0.3 (95% CI, -0.5 to -0.1) after adjusting for baseline distress. Conclusions and Relevance: The SEE glaucoma coaching program improved glaucoma medication adherence and reduced glaucoma-related distress compared with standard written education. The SEE program represents an evidence-based method to improve medication adherence necessary to improve glaucoma outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04735653.

Indexed as

Adherence InterventionsAntihypertensive AgentsGlaucomaMedication AdherenceMentoringPatient Education as TopicAgedDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmic SolutionsQuality of LifeAntihypertensive AgentsOphthalmic Solutions

Identifiers

PMID41746659
PMCPMC12947086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.