Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41746634›Full record

ArticleHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2026

Deep learning-assisted tumor radiomic dynamics on MRI predict pathological complete response in HCC undergoing immune-based therapy followed by hepatectomy.

Shi-Qi Zhou, Lu-Na Wang, Li-Fang Wu, Li-Yu Sun, Yu-Chen Yang, Zi-Yue Yang, Zi-Yi Wang, Tian He, Fei Li, Ling-Li Chen and 13 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Shi-Qi ZhouDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7769-319
Lu-Na WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Li-Fang WuShanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Li-Yu SunDepartment of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Liver Cancer Center, Tianjin, China.
Yu-Chen YangDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zi-Yue YangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zi-Yi WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Tian HeDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fei LiDepartment of Research and Development, Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Ling-Li ChenDepartment of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hui LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao-Dong ZhuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ying-Hao ShenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Cheng HuangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yuan JiDepartment of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qiang GaoDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jian ZhouDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jia FanDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yong-Jun ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Tian-Qiang SongDepartment of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Liver Cancer Center, Tianjin, China.
Bin XuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hui-Chuan SunDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
China Liver Cancer Study Group Young Investigators (CLEAP)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPathological complete response (pCR) following conversion therapy for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) remains challenging to predict preoperatively. This study developed and validated a model integrating clinicopathological and radiomic features of the tumor to predict pCR.

methodsIn this multicenter retrospective study, temporal radiomics features were extracted from baseline, post-treatment, and delta (change) MRIs. Serum AFP response was calculated as log₁₀(preoperative AFP)/log₁₀(baseline AFP). Univariate analysis, collinearity assessment, LASSO, and random forest were employed to perform feature selection. Fourteen machine learning models were benchmarked, with performance evaluated by using comprehensive metrics AUC, NPV, PPV, sensitivity, specificity, calibration, and decision curve analysis.

resultsThe model was developed and validated in a training (n=78), an internal test (n=32), and an independent validation cohort (n=44). The delta radiomic model significantly outperformed both baseline (test AUC: 0.835 vs. 0.483, p <0.05; validation AUC: 0.783 vs. 0.434, p <0.05) and preoperative models (test AUC: 0.685, p <0.05; validation AUC: 0.506, p <0.05), demonstrating superior predictive performance and generalization capability in predicting lesion-level pCR. Notably, when predicting patient-level pCR, the radiomic model also showed robust discrimination, with AUCs of 0.819 in the test set and 0.781 in the validation set. The combined radiomics-AFP model achieved even higher AUCs of 0.920 (test) and 0.857 (validation) in predicting lesion-level pCR.

conclusionsDynamic radiomic changes effectively predict pCR in uHCC after conversion therapy. Combining delta radiomics with AFP response significantly improves predictive performance, offering a non-invasive method for assessing pCR and potentially guiding personalized treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularDeep LearningLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHepatectomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPathologic Complete ResponsePredictive Learning ModelsPredictive Value of TestsRadiomicsRandom ForestRetrospective Studiescarcinomahepatocellularimmunotherapymolecular targeted therapypathological complete responseradiomics

Identifiers

PMID41746634
PMCPMC13374646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.