ArticleMemory & cognition2026
Travelling through time and space in working memory.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neural signatures of serial order access in verbal working memory.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We looked at how spatial and temporal position influence access of items in working memory. In three experiments, we probed people to recall items from a sequence of digits presented in a horizontal array. In Experiment 1, we found that decorrelating spatial and temporal position led to a drop in accuracy, and that people confused items based on both temporal and spatial position. Latencies increased across input positions in the correlated condition, but not in the uncorrelated condition. In Experiments 2-4, we probed people to recall multiple items sequentially, and found that latencies increased with both temporal and spatial distance between probes, and that longer and more complex output sequences across positions produced slower recall. The results suggest that both temporal and spatial position are used to access items in working memory, and that people travel through a mental representation of space to access items. However, the full pattern of results is complex, and challenges existing theories of the involvement of time and space in working memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.