ArticleClinical drug investigation2026
Cost Effectiveness of Osimertinib with Chemotherapy Compared to Osimertinib Monotherapy and First-Generation EGFR-TKIs in Advanced NSCLC in the USA.
Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesIn clinical trials, osimertinib combined with chemotherapy has demonstrated improved efficacy in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer. However, the projected long-term outcomes and the associated cost effectiveness compared to osimertinib monotherapy and first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors remain uncertain.
methodsA lifetime partitioned survival model was developed from the US healthcare sector perspective using clinical trial data from pivotal trials FLAURA and FLAURA2. Model inputs included drug costs, administration costs, and health utilities sourced from the published literature. Dynamic drug pricing and a 3% discount rate were incorporated. Outcomes included life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), total costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.
resultsCombination therapy yielded 2.96 QALYs at a cost of $692,796. The resultant incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $265,601/QALY versus osimertinib monotherapy and $467,747/QALY versus first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Findings were consistent across sensitivity analyses.
conclusionsWhile clinically effective, based on commonly accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds in the USA, our study suggests that osimertinib plus chemotherapy was not cost effective compared to osimertinib alone or first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41746542What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.