ArticleOdontology2026
Prevalence and morphometric assessment of the middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars in a turkish population: A CBCT study.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the configurations, prevalence, and morphometric relationships of the middle mesial canal (MMC) with surrounding structures in mandibular first molars (MFMs) of a Turkish population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). CBCT images of 2,999 retrospectively selected MFMs were examined. The presence and configuration of the MMC and its relationship with the mesiobuccal (MB) and mesiolingual (ML) canals were assessed. In addition, the distances between the MB-ML, MB-MMC, and ML-MMC canal orifices and the vertical distances from the MB, ML, and MMC orifices to the pulpal floor (PF) were measured. Buccolingual (BL) and mesiodistal (MD) dimensions and their ratios were also analyzed in relation to the presence of the MMC. An MMC was detected in 24.5% of the examined teeth. Among these, 77.8% exhibited a configuration merging with the MB canal. The presence of an MMC was significantly associated with a smaller BL width and a larger MD width (p < 0.001). The MMC orifice was positioned deeper than the MB and ML orifices. In the Turkish population, MMCs were observed in 24.5% of MFMs, most commonly showing a merging configuration with the MB canal. The presence of an MMC can be predicted by specific morphometric parameters, and access can be facilitated by troughing between the MB and ML canals. These findings highlight the importance of anatomical awareness of the MMC to enhance clinical success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.