Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41746519›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2026

Effect of spray-dried porcine plasma and plasma hydrolysate on the health and performance of mycotoxin-challenged piglets at weaning.

Lucieli Kamila Muller, Diovani Paiano, Rafael Domingos Augusto Rofino, Sofia Contini, Tatiane L Esposito, Maria Eduarda de Costa, Gilnei Bruno da Silva, Daiane Manica, Margarete Dulce Bagatini, Eduardo M da Gloria and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lucieli Kamila MullerPrograma de Pós-graduação em Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Lages, Brasil.
Diovani PaianoDepartamento de Zootecnia, UDESC, Chapecó, Brasil.
Rafael Domingos Augusto RofinoPrograma de Pós-graduação em Zootecnia, UDESC, Chapecó, Brasil.
Sofia ContiniDepartamento de Zootecnia, UDESC, Chapecó, Brasil.
Tatiane L EspositoDepartamento de Zootecnia, UDESC, Chapecó, Brasil.
Maria Eduarda de CostaDepartamento de Zootecnia, UDESC, Chapecó, Brasil.
Gilnei Bruno da SilvaPrograma de Pós-graduação em Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Lages, Brasil.
Daiane ManicaCentro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal Fronteira Sul, Chapecó, Brasil.
Margarete Dulce BagatiniCentro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal Fronteira Sul, Chapecó, Brasil.
Eduardo M da GloriaDepartment of Biological Science, Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brasil.
Aleksandro S da SilvaPrograma de Pós-graduação em Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC), Lages, Brasil. aleksandro.silva@udesc.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9860-1933

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of Spray-dried porcine plasma (SDPP) and hydrolysate plasma (HP) in the diets of post-weaning piglets challenged with mycotoxins (aflatoxin and fumonisin). The experiment lasted a total of 35 days, divided into three stages: pre-nursery I (d1-7), pre-nursery II (d8-14) and initial (d15-35). Seventy-two entire male piglets (26 days old) distributed in six treatments were tested, consisting of diets: T1 control (without SDPP, HP, and mycotoxins); T2 - with combined mycotoxins (300 ppb aflatoxin + 8.0 ppm fumonisin); T3 - with HP (pre-1–6%; pre-2–4%); T4 - with HP (pre-1–6%; pre-2–4%) + mycotoxins (300ppb aflatoxins + 8ppm fumonisin); T5 - with SDPP (pre-1–6%; pre-2–4%); T6 - with SDPP (pre-1–6%; pre-2–4%) + mycotoxins (300ppb aflatoxins + 8ppm fumonisin). Mycotoxins had a negative effect on performance, reducing body weight, and average daily gain (ADG) at days 15 to 35, in addition to increasing the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), lipid peroxidation (TBARS), myeloperoxidase (MPO) and protein thiols (PSH) (p < 0.05). While SDPP increased body weight, ADG and daily feed intake (DFI), in addition to presenting an antioxidant effect (p < 0.05). Intake of HP increased DFI (d1 to 7; and d8 to 14), but induced an increase in ROS (d35) and TBARS at day 14 (p < 0.05). The addition of SDPP and HP to the mycotoxin-contaminated diet was unable to minimize or prevent the disorders caused by aflatoxin and fumonisin. The mycotoxins caused subclinical intoxication with alterations in sensitive biomarkers of cellular damage, and oxidative stress, in addition to compromising animal performance. SDPP group provided greater performance than HP group. While HP, despite increasing feed intake, appears to stimulate pro-oxidant variables. According to our results, appear that SDPP and HP have different properties, which resulted in different results for various performance and health biomarkers in piglets under mycotoxin contamination.

Indexed as

AflatoxinsFumonisinsMycotoxinsPlasmaProtein HydrolysatesSus scrofaAnimal FeedAnimalsDietMaleOxidative StressSpray DryingSwineWeaningAflatoxinsFumonisinsMycotoxinsProtein HydrolysatesHydrolyzed plasmaMycotoxinPig farmingSpray-dried plasma

Identifiers

PMID41746519
PMCPMC12945970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.