ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2026
Evaluating deep learning models for pancreatic cancer diagnosis.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive and often fatal disease, with early detection being a key factor for improving patient survival. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning, have demonstrated significant potential in disease diagnosis based on histopathological images. This study investigates the effectiveness of two deep learning models, residual neural network (ResNet) and visual geometry group network (VGG), in distinguishing pancreatic cancer tissue from normal pancreatic tissue using histological images. A total of 3,000 hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained pathological images were collected for both normal pancreatic tissue and pancreatic cancer tissue. The images were acquired using a microscopic slide scanning system in our laboratory. After preprocessing steps such as cropping, resizing, and normalization, the images were input into two deep neural networks, ResNet and VGG, for training and testing. The deep learning models were implemented using the PyTorch framework and tested on a CUDA10 parallel computing platform. ResNet achieved an accuracy of 92.27% and an F1-score of 0.92, outperforming VGG, which achieved an accuracy of 86.01% and an F1-score of 0.86. K-fold cross-validation was performed to evaluate the generalization ability of the models. The results showed that deep learning models, particularly ResNet, offer substantial promise for improving the accuracy of pancreatic cancer diagnosis, potentially facilitating earlier and more accurate detection in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.