ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026
Beyond the heart: a pictorial review of extracardiac findings on cardiac CT.
Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac computed tomography (CT) is a cornerstone imaging modality for the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease, with widespread applications from the evaluation of chest pain to planning a wide range of minimally invasive procedures. The field of view obtained during imaging includes the heart and surrounding structures, including pericardium, thoracic great vessels, mediastinum, lungs, bones, and upper abdomen. Extracardiac findings have been reported in up to 61% of patients evaluated for chest pain, highlighting the importance of carefully analyzing and evaluating extracardiac structures. False positive interpretation leads to additional downstream testing, increasing health care costs and patient anxiety. Conversely, false negative interpretation, resulting in missed diagnoses, may pose even greater risk to patients. This review article provides a structured approach to evaluate for extracardiac findings on cardiac CT. With a rapid expansion of cardiac CT utilization, endorsed by multiple cardiovascular guidelines, it is imperative to establish and uphold standardized interpretation protocols for extracardiac findings that may have important clinical implications for patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41746481What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.