Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41746477›Full record

Observational studyNeurocritical care2026

Prognostic Value of MRI Anatomical Radiologic Scores for One-Year Neurological Outcome After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Théo Avignon, Vincent Doat-Sarfati, Thibault Agripnidis, Zacharie Cammilleri, Jean-François Hak, Jérémie Nakache, David Meunier, Julien Sein, Yanis Goutal-Guérin, Jeanne Morel and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00577954 (Multimodal Magnetic Resonance), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00577954 completednot on this map

Multimodal Magnetic Resonance (MRI) Development in Comatose Patients for an Algorithm in the Prediction of Consciousness Recovery

TypeobservationalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2006 to 2014Enrolled417ConditionsComaArmsMultimodal MRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Théo AvignonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Aix Marseille University, AP-HM, University Hospital Timone, Marseille, France.
Vincent Doat-SarfatiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Thibault Agripnidis *Neuroimagery Department, Aix Marseille University, AP-HM, University Hospital Timone, Marseille, France.
Zacharie Cammilleri *Neuroimagery Department, Aix Marseille University, AP-HM, University Hospital Timone, Marseille, France.
Jean-François HakNeuroimagery Department, Aix Marseille University, AP-HM, University Hospital Timone, Marseille, France.
Jérémie NakacheDepartment of Public Health and Biostatistics, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
David MeunierTimone Neuroscience Institute, CNRS, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Julien SeinAix-Marseille University, CNRS, MRI- Center, INT, Institute of Neuroscience of la Timone, Marseille, France.
Yanis Goutal-GuérinTimone Neuroscience Institute, CNRS, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Jeanne MorelDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Aix Marseille University, AP-HM, University Hospital Timone, Marseille, France.
David CouretNeurocritical Care Unit, University Hospital Saint Pierre, Réunion Univ, Saint Pierre, La Réunion, France.
Damien GalanaudDepartment of Neuroradiology, Sorbonne Université, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
David LagierDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, SAR1, Aix Marseille University, AP-HM, University Hospital Timone, Marseille, France.
Lionel VellyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Aix Marseille University, AP-HM, University Hospital Timone, Marseille, France.
Alice JacquensDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Vincent DegosDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Louis PuybassetDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Pierre SimeoneDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Aix Marseille University, AP-HM, University Hospital Timone, Marseille, France. pierre.simeone@ap-hm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0682-9405

Funding

Phocéo Bourse à la mobilité 2024Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation Bourse à la mobilité SFAR - 2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere traumatic brain injury (sTBI) is a major cause of mortality and long-term disability, and early prognostic evaluation is essential to support therapeutic decision-making in intensive care. MRI is the reference imaging modality for detecting diffuse axonal injury (DAI), yet the prognostic accuracy and reproducibility of MRI-based radiologic scoring systems remain uncertain. This study aimed to compare the prognostic performance of five published MRI-based DAI scores for predicting 1-year neurological outcome, in a cohort of sTBI patients admitted to intensive care.

methodsWe analyzed adult patients with sTBI included in the prospective MRI-COMA cohort (NCT00577954). Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, admission to ICU for sTBI, and absence of command following within 7 days after sedation withdrawal. Brain MRI was performed between day 7 and day 35 post-injury using standardized T1, FLAIR, T2*/SWI, and diffusion-weighted sequences. Three blinded evaluators (one neurointensivist, two neuroradiologists) independently applied five radiologic scores (Adams, Firsching, Hamdeh, Stockholm, Trondheim). The primary endpoint was the ability of each MRI-based radiologic score to predict 1-year neurological outcome, dichotomized as favorable (GOSE 5-8) or unfavorable (GOSE 1-4). Inter-rater reliability was quantified using Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa coefficients.

resultsBetween 2007 and 2023, 443 patients were screened and 185 met eligibility criteria. At one year, 111 patients (59%) had an unfavorable outcome. The prognostic performance of the five MRI scores was moderate, with AUCs ranging from 0.60 [CI95 0.52-0.68] to 0.70 [CI95 0.63-0.77], with no significant differences across scores or raters even between the intensivist and radiologists. Inter-rater reliability was fair to moderate (Fleiss' κ = 0.28 [CI95 0.22-0.34] to 0.38 [CI95 0.33-0.43]).

conclusionConventional MRI-based scores have limited prognostic value and reproducibility in cases of sTBI and are therefore not suitable for accurate and objective neuroprognostication.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticDiffuse Axonal InjuryMagnetic Resonance ImagingOutcome Assessment, Health CareAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsDiffuse axonal injuryMagnetic resonance imagingPrognosisRadiologic scoringSevere traumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID41746477
PMCPMC13369353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.