ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Probiotics and enzymes in weaned piglets' diets can lower belly nosing frequency and improve performance and nitrogen balance.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two studies were conducted to evaluate the effect of two classes of feed additives, probiotics and enzymes, on performance, diarrhea incidence, belly nosing frequency, and nutrient metabolism in post weaned piglets. The hypothesis was that the association of probiotics and multienzymes would reduce diarrhea, improve behavioral outcomes, and enhance nutrient digestion and absorption, leading to better performance and health. In the first trial, 80 weaned piglets, barrows and gilts, were distributed in four treatments using a randomized block design based on the initial weight. Each treatment had five replicates (pens), housing four piglets. The treatments were as follows: CON – no feed additives; AB – antibiotics (lincomycin and colistin); FA - probiotic (Bacillus subtilis, 3 × 108 CFU/g) and multienzymes (exoglycanase, endoglycanase, protease, pectinase, polygalacturonidase, and β-amylase); AB + FA - antibiotic, probiotics, and multienzymes. Piglets were weighed at the start of the trial and on days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35. Feed intake was recorded to calculate body weight (BW), average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and the feed-to-gain ratio (F: G). Diarrhea score and belly nosing behavior were evaluated daily by the same observer. In the second trial, 20 barrows were selected at the end of the nursery phase, allocated in a randomized block design based on their initial weight, and housed in metabolic cages. For 12 days, the piglets were subjected to the same four treatments as in the first trial. Total feces and urine were collected during the last four days to assess the dry matter digestibility coefficient, gross energy digestibility coefficient, digestible energy, metabolizable energy, absorbed nitrogen (NABS), retained nitrogen, and the ratio of retained to absorbed nitrogen. Statistical analysis was performed in SAS, linear mixed models and Tukey were used for performance variables and digestibility. For fecal score analysis and belly nosing frequency, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s test were adopted. Means were considered statistically different when p < 0.05. In the first study, the BW and ADG of the AB + FA group were 7.56% and 56.86% higher, respectively, than those of the AB group. During the first week, the AB group had a lower ADFI compared to all other treatments. The AB + FA group exhibited a 20.17% lower frequency of belly nosing compared to piglets in the CON group. Additionally, the FA group had 7.14% higher NABS compared to the CON group. Within the conditions of the present study, supplementing piglet diets containing antibiotics with probiotics and a multienzyme blend appeared to improve performance, reduce undesirable behaviors, and enhance protein utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.