Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41746456›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2026

Probiotics and enzymes in weaned piglets' diets can lower belly nosing frequency and improve performance and nitrogen balance.

Bruno Braga Carnino, Ana Ligia Braga Mezzina, Nadia de Almeida Ciriaco Gomes, Guilherme Cunha Gottschall, Bruno Bracco Donatelli Muro, Leticia Gomes de Morais Amaral, Cesar Augusto Pospissil Garbossa, Vinícius de Souza Cantarelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bruno Braga CarninoSwine Research Laboratory, Animal Nutrition and Production Department, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.
Ana Ligia Braga MezzinaSwine Research Laboratory, Animal Nutrition and Production Department, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.
Nadia de Almeida Ciriaco GomesSwine Research Laboratory, Animal Nutrition and Production Department, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.
Guilherme Cunha GottschallSwine Research Laboratory, Animal Nutrition and Production Department, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.
Bruno Bracco Donatelli MuroSwine Research Laboratory, Animal Nutrition and Production Department, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.
Leticia Gomes de Morais AmaralAnimal Science Department, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil.
Cesar Augusto Pospissil GarbossaSwine Research Laboratory, Animal Nutrition and Production Department, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil. cgarbossa@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3244-7184
Vinícius de Souza CantarelliAnimal Science Department, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to evaluate the effect of two classes of feed additives, probiotics and enzymes, on performance, diarrhea incidence, belly nosing frequency, and nutrient metabolism in post weaned piglets. The hypothesis was that the association of probiotics and multienzymes would reduce diarrhea, improve behavioral outcomes, and enhance nutrient digestion and absorption, leading to better performance and health. In the first trial, 80 weaned piglets, barrows and gilts, were distributed in four treatments using a randomized block design based on the initial weight. Each treatment had five replicates (pens), housing four piglets. The treatments were as follows: CON – no feed additives; AB – antibiotics (lincomycin and colistin); FA - probiotic (Bacillus subtilis, 3 × 108 CFU/g) and multienzymes (exoglycanase, endoglycanase, protease, pectinase, polygalacturonidase, and β-amylase); AB + FA - antibiotic, probiotics, and multienzymes. Piglets were weighed at the start of the trial and on days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35. Feed intake was recorded to calculate body weight (BW), average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and the feed-to-gain ratio (F: G). Diarrhea score and belly nosing behavior were evaluated daily by the same observer. In the second trial, 20 barrows were selected at the end of the nursery phase, allocated in a randomized block design based on their initial weight, and housed in metabolic cages. For 12 days, the piglets were subjected to the same four treatments as in the first trial. Total feces and urine were collected during the last four days to assess the dry matter digestibility coefficient, gross energy digestibility coefficient, digestible energy, metabolizable energy, absorbed nitrogen (NABS), retained nitrogen, and the ratio of retained to absorbed nitrogen. Statistical analysis was performed in SAS, linear mixed models and Tukey were used for performance variables and digestibility. For fecal score analysis and belly nosing frequency, Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s test were adopted. Means were considered statistically different when p < 0.05. In the first study, the BW and ADG of the AB + FA group were 7.56% and 56.86% higher, respectively, than those of the AB group. During the first week, the AB group had a lower ADFI compared to all other treatments. The AB + FA group exhibited a 20.17% lower frequency of belly nosing compared to piglets in the CON group. Additionally, the FA group had 7.14% higher NABS compared to the CON group. Within the conditions of the present study, supplementing piglet diets containing antibiotics with probiotics and a multienzyme blend appeared to improve performance, reduce undesirable behaviors, and enhance protein utilization.

Indexed as

DiarrheaEnzymesNitrogenProbioticsSus scrofaSwine DiseasesAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDietDietary SupplementsFemaleMaleSwineWeaningAnti-Bacterial AgentsEnzymesNitrogenAntibioticsMetabolismNurseryNutritionSwineWelfare

Identifiers

PMID41746456
PMCPMC12945963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.