ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Antibiotic prophylaxis and infection risk in pediatric ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt surgery is a common neurosurgical procedure in pediatrics, but it carries a significant risk of surgical site infections (SSIs). Antibiotic prophylaxis is widely used to prevent SSIs, but its efficacy in this context remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the existing evidence on the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing infection rates in pediatric patients undergoing VP shunt surgery. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Google Scholar, and Quality Outcome Database (QOD), from 1975 to June 2025. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational reporting infection rates after antibiotic prophylaxis in pediatric patients (< 18 years) undergoing VP shunt surgery. Two reviewers independently performed the screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. Infection risk was reported as risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analyses were conducted according to antibiotic type and study design. Additionally, proportional meta-analysis was conducted for the antibiotic group. We included 11 studies, eight RCTs and three retrospective cohorts, comprising 2379 patients. The pooled rate of infection among patients receiving antibiotics was 6.3%. The use of prophylactic antibiotics significantly reduced the risk of infection (RR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.80, P = 0.0016). Subgroup analysis showed that vancomycin was associated with a significant reduction in infection (RR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.94, P = 0.03), while methicillin (P = 0.052) and other antibiotics (P = 0.09) were not.
conclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis showed that antibiotic prophylaxis, particularly vancomycin, significantly reduced infection rates in pediatric patients undergoing VP shunt surgery. Given that most of the included studies were conducted before 2000 and that there was substantial heterogeneity in infection definitions as well as in the type, dose, duration, and route of antibiotic prophylaxis, the overall findings suggest a potential benefit; however, these results should be interpreted with caution and cannot be directly extrapolated to contemporary clinical practice. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection is a major complication in pediatric hydrocephalus requiring effective antimicrobial prevention and treatment strategies. • Optimal antibiotic selection for reducing shunt infection remains debated across studies. WHAT IS NEW: • This meta-analysis suggests improved infection control outcomes with vancomycin-based strategies in VP shunt management. • Findings should be interpreted cautiously given study heterogeneity and limitations of available evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41746425What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.