Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41746415›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2026

Wakeful rest and memory consolidation in an ecologically valid educational setting: no benefit over distractor tasks.

Peter Seban, Radovan Šikl, Tomáš Prošek, Kamila Urban

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter SebanInstitute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, Bratislava, 841 04, Slovakia. peter.seban@savba.sk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8717-1616
Radovan ŠiklInstitute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7277-8183
Tomáš ProšekInstitute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9453-4649
Kamila UrbanInstitute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, Bratislava, 841 04, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4547-9804

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-learning activities are thought to influence how well newly learned information is consolidated into memory. The present study investigated whether wakeful rest provides advantages for memory consolidation compared to common distractor activities. University students (N = 161) read an expository text and were randomly assigned to one of four 8-minute post-reading conditions: wakeful rest, social media use, math task, or reading an interference text. Participants completed an immediate test assessing both conceptual understanding and factual recall, followed by a delayed test one week later using different but conceptually aligned test items. Results showed a significant decline in performance from the immediate to the delayed test across all groups. However, the wakeful rest condition did not yield consistent benefits relative to the distractor conditions. These findings suggest that in a real-world educational setting, wakeful rest may not provide superior benefits for conceptual understanding and memory retention relative to other post-learning activities.

Indexed as

AttentionComprehensionMemory ConsolidationMental RecallReadingRestWakefulnessAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleSocial MediaYoung Adultdistractor tasksimilarity paradoxsocial media usetext comprehensionwakeful resting

Identifiers

PMID41746415
PMCPMC12945945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.