ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Factors associated with anticipatory grief in family caregivers of patients with esophageal cancer: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anticipatory Grief Among Family Caregivers of Terminally Ill Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Study Among Bangladeshi Population.Palliative medicine reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the level of anticipatory grief (AG) among family caregivers of patients with esophageal cancer and to identify associated factors.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with 312 caregivers recruited from a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China. Data were collected using the Anticipatory Grief Scale, the Knowledge and Skills of Caregiving Scale, Zarit Burden Interview, Positive Aspects of Caregiving, the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire, and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Descriptive statistics, univariate analyses, and multiple linear regression were performed. An exploratory mediation analysis was further conducted to examine whether caregiver burden mediated the association between perceived social support and AG.
resultsThe mean AGS score was 75.55 ± 14.24, indicating a moderate level of AG. Higher AG was independently associated with greater caregiver burden (β = 0.352, p < 0.001), more negative coping (β = 0.301, p < 0.001), higher perceived social support (β = 0.168, p = 0.003), greater positive aspects of caregiving (β = 0.113, p = 0.032), and no prior bereavement experience (β = 0.114, p = 0.040), whereas positive coping was protective (β = - 0.210, p = 0.001). The model explained 44.1% of the variance in AG. Mediation analysis showed that caregiver burden partially mediated the association between perceived social support and AG (indirect effect = 0.113, 95% bootstrap CI [0.035, 0.211]), while the direct effect remained significant.
conclusionAG is common among caregivers of patients with esophageal cancer in the perioperative period. Interventions should prioritize reducing caregiver burden and promoting adaptive coping strategies, particularly for caregivers without prior bereavement experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41746402What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.