ArticlePsychological research2026
Positive affect increases aperiodic brain activity.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Periodic and aperiodic components during shooting preparation and pre-/post-task resting states: a spectral parameterization study.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metacontrol refers to the capacity to effectively balance persistence and flexibility according to situational circumstances. Recent studies suggest a crucial role of cortical noise in metacontrol by showing that the aperiodic exponent, a measure of aperiodic neural activity, varies systematically with metacontrol requirements. Given the behavioral evidence that affect and metacontrol are related, we predicted that affect could also induce systematic changes of the aperiodic exponent. We thus analyzed aperiodic activity in response to affective facial expressions of negative, neutral, or positive valence in a 2-back task from two separate datasets. Our results showed that, at the whole-brain level, aperiodic activity was higher for positive faces than for both neutral and negative faces, but only if valence was blocked (i.e., was the same over consecutive trials). Subsequent analysis further showed that the difference was significant in electrodes widely spread across the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that aperiodic activity changed with affective valence and was more pronounced when processing positive, as compared to neutral or negative stimuli.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.