ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Cortical activation in precision grip and its association with manual dexterity: a foundational fNIRS study.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cortical activation and functional connectivity during dual-task walking under different cognitive loads: an fNIRS study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fine motor tasks that involve precision grip depend on both motor control and cognitive processes. However, the neural mechanisms underlying individual differences in manual dexterity remain incompletely understood, particularly under ecologically valid task conditions. The present study aimed to establish a controlled functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) paradigm capable of isolating cortical activation specifically elicited by precision grip, and to examine whether such activation is associated with individual differences in manual dexterity. Manual dexterity was assessed using the Purdue Pegboard test (PPT). Cortical activity was measured using 44-channel fNIRS while 40 young adult participants performed temporally controlled precision grip tasks derived from the PPT with either their right or left hand. Precision grip tasks elicited significant increases in oxyhemoglobin signal in bilateral prefrontal and sensorimotor regions compared with a control task. Furthermore, higher PPT assembly scores were associated with greater task-related activation in the lateral prefrontal cortex during right-hand precision grip task. In applied terms, greater task-evoked activation should be interpreted as increased cortical recruitment required to meet precision demands, rather than as inherently superior performance. Taken together, these preliminary findings provide a foundational reference for understanding precision grip–related cortical recruitment and its association with individual differences in manual dexterity, and demonstrate the feasibility of using fNIRS to study cognitive–motor integration under realistic task conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.